Will paid search prices be affected by Google - Yahoo search ad deal?

Posted by jyoung at 14:16 pm | Filed In PPC

hal varian, sam eagle impersonator

Hal Varian, Chief Economist for Google, Berkeley Professor, author of the awesome book Information Rules and amateur Sam Eagle impersonator, tears down a white paper by an SEM company that predicts that the deal Yahoo made to serve Google ads will cause a 22% increase in Yahoo PPC bid prices. Varian asserts that the defects in the paper’s methodology make its conclusions about as legitimate as a $50 Rolex.

Whew, I’d hate to be those guys. The thought of going toe to toe with Varian is terrifying. But Professor Varian’s critique of the study does nothing to address advertisers concerns that changing the bidding structure will impact the price of advertising on Yahoo keywords.

Ask Jeeves partnered with Google to serve ads on Teoma and other products back in 2002. They determined whether to display an Ask Jeeves ad or a Google ad by the $$$$ they’d receive. Expensive ad goes to the top. Makes sense. Professor Varian says that Yahoo has a “strong economic incentive” to serve their own ads rather than Google’s; full share vs. partial share of profit. He also points out that Google and Yahoo won’t be able to see one another’s bid prices.

But neither company has detailed how their ad services will be integrated. Advertisers make higher bids for Google than Yahoo; it’s not unreasonable to speculate that Google and Yahoo might adopt a bidding model that would result in advertisers driving up prices on Yahoo keywords. There has been no information on the workings of the bidding system that demonstrates that this won’t occur.

it's a search engine spider, get it?
spider stories: google yahoo deal questions

Here’s Google’s press release about the agreement to provide ads for Yahoo. http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/our-agreement-to-provide-ad-technology.html

Here’s Yahoo’s press release on the same subject.
http://yhoo.client.shareholder.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=316450

Search Engine Watch Article about Google deal to provide ads for Ask Jeeves
http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=2164921

Google Privacy Policy Update

Posted by jyoung at 15:20 pm | Filed In Google

Last week’s Google privacy update, reveals that the company will anonymize IP addresses after 9 months, down from 18 months. Check out this NPR: On the Media piece about privacy concerns arising from Chrome and other Google services.

Google VP of Search Products and User Experience and Ninjitsu, Marissa Mayer, asserts that Google is better qualified to choose privacy settings than end users, that data storage involves balancing privacy concerns and the utility of usage data for product development, that Google is very open about what user information they collect and retain, that ISPs really have a whole lot more data than Google does.

did you mean is a Google.com feature using search data


My favorite line is Bob Garfield’s stinger, “Does Google believe, institutionally, that all the discussion of privacy concerns is actually stifling innovation of your algorithm and other technological development…or do you kind of get why it’s important to all of us?”

Right on. I work for an Internet marketing company that exists mostly because of Google and the ads and search results it serves. Because Pure Visibility is an AdWords and Analytics partner, we get to communicate our successes and concerns with reps at Google. I know a number of Googlers personally. I’ve had a really nice time at lectures at the Google Office in Ann Arbor. None of this precludes my wariness about Google’s effect on my privacy online.

By Christmas this year, I’ll have been a Gmail user for four years. During that time, I’ve sent and received several thousand emails. Google has used the “concepts” in emails I’ve written and received to show me thousands of ads for products and services that might interest me. I’m pleased that I don’t get too much spam, I love how searchable my mail is, and I feel confident that my data won’t be lost. But even after four years, I remain concerned about the decision I made to exchange access to information about me for the privilege of using Gmail. I look forward to looking deeper into Google’s privacy policy and writing about privacy and advertising on the web in future posts.

Check out Bob Garfield’s blog for Advertising Age
http://adage.com/garfield/

Visit the Google Privacy Center for detailed information about the use of your personal data by various products. The videos are pretty good, explaining what data the company collects and why; not too much technical detail.
http://www.google.com/privacy.html

March 2007 Google Privacy Policy Announcement
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2007/03/taking-steps-to-further-improve-our.html

September 2008 Google Privacy Policy Announcement
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/another-step-to-protect-user-privacy.html

What is Social Media, and Why Should I Invest It?

Posted by jhullman at 16:04 pm | Filed In Social Media

“Social media”, in its short history as a phrase, has been applied to a range of technologies, entities, and relationships. The ambiguous nature (not to mention using the word ’social’ in business or technological environment) can make the initial decision of whether to expand a web strategy to include social media a difficult one for companies.

A recent post by Alex did a good job of differentiating the social network from the internet community, at least as far as the common understanding goes. A social network as most people use the term is a place where users can create profiles for themselves (or for their business) and connect to friends. Like interests can play into connections that spring up between individuals who’ve never met, but generally the emphasis is on friendship and relationships. Contrast this to an internet community, which can be envisioned as an environment dominated by die-hards, whether they are die-hard techies, golfers, gamers, knitters, or dog-lovers.

Yet another layer of the ’social’-net is social bookmarking, tools that allow a user to create an account, and then cast a ‘vote’ for any websites, blogs, images, videos, or other online content that they enjoy by tagging it with a term or phrase that describes it. A user’s bookmark collection can be viewed publicly, and used by online searches who are looking for items tagged by certain terms can use the bookmarks to find relevant content.

So why should a company care about social networks and communities, especially when times are tight and advertising dollars must be carefully tracked?

The influence of social networks in people’s lives is hard to dispute. Tupperware became a household name, and multi-million dollar corporation, because housewives tended to have large social networks. New technologies arise and quickly gain popularity, thanks to internet forums devoted to geeky interests. Decisions about where to stay when going on a trip, where to eat, what brand of shoes to buy, are surprisingly based on the opinions of others: research reveals that “consumers report being willing to pay from 20% to 99% more for a 5-star-rated item than a 4-star-rated item (with variance depending on type of item/service)”.

Imagine a potential customer of any product or service. If considering something new, they will need information, which they connect with in multiple stages. They will seek out websites and other sources while researching and planning a purchase. At this stage, they draw on what they know and refine their goals based on the information they find. If it’s a trip being considered, they will gather input from reputable, information rich sites, plan routes and calculate driving times. If its a service, they will refine their expectations of the service based on provider websites, as well as testimonials, videos and reviews by past consumers.

During the planning process, people talk through ideas and exchange stories with friends, family, and coworkers, but they also communicate with people they don’t directly know, via online discussion boards and social networks. Their conversations will be reflected online when individuals post status messages and queries in Facebook and Twitter, upload pictures and videos to MySpace, Facebook, Flickr and YouTube, and write in message boards and their blogs.

The best part of social media is that it costs less than other advertising media! The smart way to generate attention-getting messages that people will place trust in is to leverage the social networks themselves, and let the members of a site do the messaging. It would be extremely expensive and challenging to create marketing messages as numerous, varied, original and compelling as those that people will independently author on social networking sites.

Ready to get started? Learn more about Pure Visibility’s Social Media Strategy.

Spreading the Internet all over the World

Posted by linda girard at 9:00 am | Filed In Google

Imagine a world where every human being on the planet has access to the Internet. Even countries where poverty today threatens their existence….what would the power of sharing knowledge with these people do - who could never dream outside of what they already only know.

Yesterday on NPR, I heard that a startup group, called O3b Networks is purchasing 16-low-earth orbit satellites with the help of Google, Liberty Global and HSBC. This venture will bring Internet service to three billion people in Africa, Asia and South America!

I wish I could see their expressions as they see Google for the first time!

Information Architecture… Category Theory, Part II

Posted by jhullman at 15:41 pm | Filed In Information Architecture

Yesterday I wrote a post about how one theme in Lakoff’s book “Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things”, the way that categories display prototype effects, can be applied to web classification schemes.

The second major takeaway from Lakoff’s theory of categorization, the status of basic-level categories, requires some understanding of what is so unique about Lakoff’s approach to category theory. Lakoff bases his assertions on an understanding that categories as we create them are embodied, that is based in our experience before any conceptual activity takes place. This is fundamentally different than the standard understanding of categories as abstract containers. Our ability to perceive gestalts combines with experientially-based structural ’schemas’ to create categories. The schemas, specifically “Kinesthetic Image Schemas”, are directly-understood concepts and/or relations like link, part-whole, container, up/down, source/path/goal … Together with gestalt perception they form the complex concepts that are human categories (which Lakoff calls by a similarly heady term, “Idealized Cognitive Models” or ICM’s).

So where does the basic-level category come in? Well, a study done by an anthropologist named Berlin in studying the speakers of Tzeltal living in the Chiapas region of Mexico found that plants and animals was categorized at a level that corresponded to the genus level of scientific classifications. Analysis of other societies has been consistent with genus as the level at which humans are most likely to turn to name an item; sub and superordinate categories are then created around above and below this middle level of the hierarchy. See this article for a little more information, or just read the book!

This phenomena can be attributed to the fact that human capacities for perception are utilized in the same way, with gestalts playing a big role. Lakoff breaks down the basic category into four aspects:

Perception: overall perceived shape; a single mental image; Gestalt.
Function: interaction with the world.
Communication: Shortest, most commonly used terms; first words learned.
Knowledge Organization: Most attributes of category members are stored at this level.

Horse, basic level category

So, back to information architecture. Often methods for designing a classification scheme for a website are divided into top-down and bottom-up methods. What Lakoff’s book suggests is an entirely different approach, centered around the basic level category, or the middle of the hierarchy. From there, a designer could move up and down to create the higher and lower levels.

Information Architecture: Insight from Category Theory

Posted by jhullman at 22:16 pm | Filed In Information Architecture

What does a very dense book written by a cognitive linguist have to do with Information Architecture, especially when there are some good texts already on this subject, such as the O’Reilly book, or the one written by Peter Van Dijck? More than you might think. So much, in fact, that this may turn into a several post series.

Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things

George Lakoff’s study “Women Fire and Dangerous Things” is the book in question. The book was a big deal when it came out in fields from linguistics to philosophy to computer science, due to some of the assertions the author makes about how human beings construct categories in order to make sense of the world. Information Architecture is about classifications - what if we could apply the key findings from experiments throughout the history of category theory in order to predict how users will label the content in a website, saving time and money in usability research?

Info Architect Donna Maeur summarizes many of the points in this document, including the important point Lakoff makes about prototype effects. Classical category theory is based on set theory, in which categories are envisioned as real-world ‘containers’, mutually exclusive. The categories we construct using language, however, don’t have one-to-one mapped real-world counterparts. Instead, they exhibit prototype effects, in which one member is more central, the ‘best example’ while others are peripheral at best. People have demonstrated in experiments that they are slower at categorizing these items.

Prototype effects imply not that one member is more (or less) of a member than others. Instead, the point is that there is some internal structure to our categories as well.

One of the coolest examples in the book of a result of prototype effects involves a story by Jean Luis Borges, in which a categorization scheme for animals is described. It includes a) those that belong to the Emperor, b) embalmed ones, c) those that are trained, d) suckling pigs, e) mermaids, f) fabulous ones … and so so. Lakoff writes of how a long-term study of an aboriginal tribe’s classification system revealed that such a scheme is not so far-fetched: their classification lumped together women, fire, and dangerous things in one group, while me, kangaroos, storms, and rainbows made of another, in addition to several more equally ludicrous ones.

Now for the take-away related to information architecture: the researcher found in the system that there was one category that could only be explained as “miscellaneous”, or “everything else”. Mythology connected men and kangaroos and rainbows, same for women, fire, and dangerous things. But this final example had no rational explination.

So, next time you are knocking your head against those last couple pages as you map out the categories in a navigation menu, consider the miscellaneous category. The hardest part, in my experience, is the name. While I can’t speak for the results of usability research with regard to such categories, I know that I tend to accept them, and even look for them on complicated sites.

Next time, I’ll talk more about the other “basic” application to info architecture, basic-level categories.

The Triumph of Numbers

Posted by Mike Beasley at 15:54 pm | Filed In Info Visualization

At Pure Visibility, we love numbers of all sizes. We love putting them together and making sense of them and telling stories about numbers.

Recently, I had the pleasure of reading The Triumph of Numbers

The Triumph of Numbers by I.B. Cohen
The Triumph of Numbers

by I.B. Cohen. His book describes how numbers began to be used for making government policies, understanding nature, and understanding people.

Most of the book deals with the 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries. In this time period, European governments began to increasingly rely on statistics about their citizens to make decisions. At the same time, science underwent a revolution. With the introduction of numbers, scientific theories could make predictions and could be disproven through experimentation.

Cohen writes about how numbers come to describe not just natural phenomena in physics and biology, but also the actions of groups of people. Further, probability could be used to predict human activities.

A big part of our work here at Pure Visibility is looking at numbers to draw insights about what people are doing on websites. As such, this book didn’t so much change my mind about anything as provide a broader perspective on an important topic.

A few reviews for the recent Website Optimization book

Posted by dgreiling at 9:51 am | Filed In Search Engine Marketing

WSO Book CoverIt’s funny. We worked with Andy King on two chapters of Website Optimization, and, until the book came out, we hadn’t seen the whole thing. I took it up north with me when I went on vacation, and I really got a lot out of the whole book. We’re sharing it with our clients, and using it to back up and further explain a few of the recommendations we make for them. Read More »

Google Chrome Integrates Search and Direct Navigation

Posted by jyoung at 18:32 pm | Filed In Google

Chrome is the brand new web browser created by Google, just released today. Looks like it incorporates a number of the best features of Firefox and Safari.  However, in this post, I just want to address one feature, One Box for Everything.

Search and direct navigation have always been done in different places. Used to be, you went to a search engine’s home page to use a search box.
search engine page

Later, browsers began building in search boxes into their interfaces.
search field in firefox

With Chrome, there is a single field that can be used to enter URLs directly, or to enter search terms.  Google suggests results for both types of input.
search in chrome
direct navigation in chrome
Collocating search and direct navigation will get more people using search than ever. Dollars to donuts, this is the new standard. Naturally, Google is Chrome’s default search engine. This means more users, more loyalty to the brand, and more ads served.

I’m heading home to install chrome on my home computer, on XP running on VMware Fusion. But I probably won’t use chrome instead of Firefox until Google releases a version for the Apple Operating System. The frustrating decision by Google to start with a Windows only release makes a lot of sense. They’re trying to take market share from Internet Explorer, which is no longer supported for the Apple OS. Plus, Google knows that the fanboy community is working itself into a frenzy in anticipation of their shiny new product. So coy.

Pay Per Oil Change

Posted by steve loszewski at 10:36 am | Filed In AdWords

Let’s pretend Google provided Car Service. Say you needed an oil change for your car, so you head over to GoogleMart’s  automotive department.  You walk in and check out their prices, and the board says:

Standard Oil Change

Minimum Price $20

“What the heck does that mean?”  You ask the kid across the counter.  He tells you that the price listed is the least you’ll be charged for an oil change, although that price might vary.

Then he asks, “What’s the most you’re willing to pay to get your oil changed?”

“Why do you need to know that?”

The kid responds, “The GoogleMart automotive department must charge at least the minimum price for you to get an oil change, but we will charge you no more than the most you’re willing to pay.  If the most you’re willing to pay is below the minimum price, we’re not going to change your oil, but you only pay anything if we actually change your oil.  How much you’re charged depends on how much other people wanting an oil change are willing to pay.  The more you’re willing to pay, the faster you’ll get your oil changed.”

Huh. The days of “I want an oil change - here’s fifteen bucks,” are clearly over.

Read More »

RSS Feed

Never miss another post.
Enter your email address and subscribe:

Pure Visibility Social Network

Follow Us On:

Facebook

Twitter

MySpace

Yahoo Search Marketing Google Adwords Partner Google Analytics Consultant

Pure Visibility Analytic Services

Need help with Google Analytics

Twitter Logo
Add to Google

Copyright 2005-2008 · Pure Visibility Inc. · All rights Reserved
201 South Main Street · Fifth Floor · Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 · Phone: (734) 213-8100 · eFax: (734) 401-6015