Skip page content

Author Archive

Finding the Right Things to Measure with Web Analytics

On February 23rd, 2012, Pure Visibility’s own Michael Beasley will be speaking on Michigan State University’s campus, at 6:00 p.m. The presentation will cover how to cut through the complexity of all the possible things you can measure with web analytics, to find the things that are really important and useful to measure, from a business and a user experience perspective.

This talk, which is the first Michigan Usability Professionals’ Association meeting of the year, brings together the areas of user experience and web metrics in much the same way Pure Visibility brings together these two fields within the work of our own Measurement Team.

For more information or to register, please visit the Michigan UPA website.

What UX Practitioners Need to Know about SEO

Ann Arbor is home to an annual conference, Internet User Experience, which covers web site design, graphics, branding, social media, and more. 2011 was another successful year for the conference and was well attended by a variety of user experience and marketing professionals.

Pure Visibility’s Michael Beasley served as master of ceremonies once again this year, and also presented a 5 minute talk during the Ignite session on “What Every UXer Needs to Know about SEO.”

What Every UXer Needs to Know about SEO

http://igniteshow.com/videos/what-every-uxer-needs-know-about-seo

This multi-disciplinary approach is typical of Pure Visibility, where we bring together experts from different fields to help our clients’ online marketing.

Getting Started with Analytics for UX

Approaching web analytics as a new user can be daunting because of the complexity of the tools. There’s no one right way to do it, but a good way is to have problems to solve or a question that needs to be answered.

Integrating analytics into our user experience practice started with the need to get clear answers to specific questions. We had questions like “How many users will we alienate if we optimize this site for a 1024 by 768 screen resolution?” which is the less open-ended version of “What screen resolution should we use to optimize our site?” (The answer, it turns out, is “all of them”).

There’s a clear answer in the Google Analytics’ Visitors > Technology > Browser & OS report. Or, at least, as clear as anything gets when you deal with anything as messy as user behavior.

Another good initial analytics/UX question is “How many of our site visitors are using a mobile device?” This is a better way of asking “Should we invest in a mobile site right now?” (The answer is “yes” and you may want to focus on designing the mobile version first, before the desktop version). Google Analytics makes this easy, through the Visitors > Mobile > Overview report.

Neither of these questions lead to terribly deep insights, but that’s the point of your first few forays into web analytics. Take a little time to get accustomed to the interface of your analytics tool and to ask the sorts of questions that analytics can actually answer. That’s why it’s good to start small and get some early wins. Have fun!

World Usability Day 2010

Next Thursday, November 11th is World Usability Day 2010, there is a great free event at Michigan State University, not too far from Pure Visibility, and there’s still time to register! This is a great opportunity to learn more about designing mobile applications. Read More

Early Popularity Predicts Long Term Popularity on YouTube, Digg

How popular is your new YouTube video going to be? Will your link make it to the front page of Digg? You may be able to estimate it after only 7 days and about 1 hour, respectively. Read More

Google Exposing Search Options

It’s been a few weeks since Google made changes to the user interface of its search results. In putting more advanced search options more firmly in front of the user, Google has broken with one of the factors that is widely credited for their success – keeping it simple. Read More

Do you buy technical standards as part of your job? We may want to interview you!

Pure Visibility is working with a company that sells engineering codes and standards to engineers, librarians, and technical professionals to conduct a usability study for their website. We’re interested in learning about how people shop for and purchase standards.

If you are an engineer, librarian, or technical professional that has purchased standards at your current job, we’d like to sit down with you for an hour to talk to you and look at our client’s website together. Our findings will remain confidential and will only be used for this project. We can meet with you during the business day or after work, either at our downtown Ann Arbor office or at any other location in the Ann Arbor/Detroit area that is more convenient for you.

If you are interested, please give us a phone number where we can reach you during the day (and let us know if there are any restrictions on when you’re available to talk). We’d like to get in touch with you for a 15 minute call to ask you a few questions and make sure that you match the profile we’re looking for for this study. Participation in this study will be on a paid basis.

User experience testing: A step on the path to awesomeness

Changes are coming to the Pure Visibility website! In the not too distant future, we will unleash a new site architecture followed by content changes and a visual redesign.
As this effort got underway, we knew it was important to employ the same skills that we bring to our clients – to eat our own cat food, you could say. We did user research and captured that information as personas and then used those personas as the basis for our information architecture work. We then took our early website prototype out to real users to gather some data about how it worked for them.
We came up with our test protocols, which included topics that we wanted to hit on in each session, and then a scenario and specific tasks to get the participants interacting with the prototype. We also had to build out and print up a robust set of prototype pages for the participants to interact with.
User experience testing with a paper prototype is a great way to elicit feedback before you’ve invested lots of time into building a site. Although it’s obviously not the same as interacting with a prototype on a computer or a real, live website, the timeliness makes it a valuable, cost-effective tool for collecting data. It also means that you get slightly different kinds of data than a test with a higher fidelity prototype or live website.
We focused on the navigation of the site – how the pages fit together, and the labeling of the pages. We put together tasks that revolved around asking our participants where they would go to find answers to questions, like “what does Pure Visibility’s pay per click reporting look like?”
As we kind of expected, we found out early on that when our participants got the scenario (basically, “you are looking for an Internet marketing company”), they wanted to break it down into different tasks than we had planned for. We were glad that we’d spent so much time building prototype pages! This insight into how participants wanted to learn about a company like us was the most important part of our research.
When we built the prototype, we incorporated copy from the existing website. As we had hoped, this copy gave our participants something to react to. In addition to learning about how our participants wanted to research us, we gained insight into how our copy sounded to them, what they really wanted to learn on pages, and how to better organize our copy.
We’re baking what we learned into the website, but there’s still a lot of work ahead of us. While user research activities are essential to to the success of any web design project, it’s not the only vital ingredient. We will turn our search engine optimization experts loose on the Pure Visibility site to take a fresh look at it from both a technical and a content perspective – and that means more blog posts yet to come!

Changes are coming to the Pure Visibility website! In the not too distant future, we will unleash a new site architecture followed by content changes and a visual redesign.

As this effort got underway, we knew it was important to employ the same skills that we bring to our clients – to eat our own cat food, you could say. We did user research and captured that information as personas and then used those personas as the basis for our information architecture work. We then took our early website prototype out to real users to gather some data about how it worked for them. Read More

Tools for Testing Information Architecture

UXmatters is a great resource for (unsurprisingly) UX-related articles, such as information architecture, usability, and user research. An article from February 22nd, “Review of Information Architecture Evaluation Tools: Chalkmark and Treejack,” provides a great overview of two user research tools from Optimal Workshop.

The first, Chalkmark, allows unmoderated testing of static mockups. You can put up a mocked up page, ask people where they would click to find information about something specific, and then Chalkmark tells you where users clicked.

The other tool that this article discusses is Treejack, which lets you test an organizational scheme, abstracted away from the actual interface. In Treejack, you build a tree that reflects how information on your site is organized into categories and sub-categories (or how you want to organize this information in the future). Again, you ask people to tell you where they think they would find a specific piece of information, but with this tool, they can click around in the tree and think about it before giving you their final answer.

The article on UXmatters goes into further detail about the analysis capabilities that both of these tools provide, and they sound pretty exciting.

ABtests.com: A/B Test Results

Do you have a page on your website that you know could be better? Do you need help showing how subtle changes can have a big effect in conversion rates?

I came across a great site recently: ABtests.com (via The Interaction Designer’s Coffee Break). It consists of the results of A/B tests. It shows two different designs, side by side, points out which one had a higher conversion rate, and presents a theory about why one design did better than the other.

Testing designs is an important part of getting your online sales engine running. It takes advantage of the unique strengths that online marketing offers – the ability to collect lots of data and test ideas. There are free tools out there for doing it, such as Google Website Optimizer, but trying out a new idea can be as simple as rolling out a new page, using it for a while, and comparing the results to the previous design.

Subscribe to our blog

Never miss another post. Enter your email address and subscribe: