<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OS X Software Update Gives You Only Inconvenient Choices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.purevisibility.com/2008/07/osx-software-update-gives-you-only-inconvenient-choices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.purevisibility.com/2008/07/osx-software-update-gives-you-only-inconvenient-choices/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:00:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Beasley</title>
		<link>http://blog.purevisibility.com/2008/07/osx-software-update-gives-you-only-inconvenient-choices/comment-page-1/#comment-656</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Beasley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.purevisibility.com/?p=197#comment-656</guid>
		<description>Regarding your second paragraph: Thank you - that&#039;s really helpful. If they made this functionality a bit more explicit, then the problem I write about is solved.

Long-term, it would be great if Software Update could handle more responsibilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding your second paragraph: Thank you &#8211; that&#8217;s really helpful. If they made this functionality a bit more explicit, then the problem I write about is solved.</p>
<p>Long-term, it would be great if Software Update could handle more responsibilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trek Glowacki</title>
		<link>http://blog.purevisibility.com/2008/07/osx-software-update-gives-you-only-inconvenient-choices/comment-page-1/#comment-655</link>
		<dc:creator>Trek Glowacki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.purevisibility.com/?p=197#comment-655</guid>
		<description>Under Leopard &quot;important&quot; updates can be set to download and install automatically (http://www.flickr.com/photos/thetrek/2688807339/).  That&#039;s probably what caused the message that some updates had been installed magically. 

Other updates that require a restart that apple doesn&#039;t consider &quot;important&quot; can be installed using software update and when it asks you to restart, just quit software update.  They&#039;ll take effect whenever you next restart your mac (which can lead to some humorous confusion if, like me, you only restart once in a great while).

The larger problem here is that Apple has yet to open up software update to third party developers.  Most are using the sparkle framework these days (http://sparkle.andymatuschak.org/) but it works on a per-app basis. Couple this with Firefox and other mozilla apps (which uses their own updater and a separate updater for addons) and it&#039;s really easy to end up in multiupdate hell: launching and relaunching apps and systems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under Leopard &#8220;important&#8221; updates can be set to download and install automatically (<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/thetrek/2688807339/)" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/thetrek/2688807339/)</a>.  That&#8217;s probably what caused the message that some updates had been installed magically. </p>
<p>Other updates that require a restart that apple doesn&#8217;t consider &#8220;important&#8221; can be installed using software update and when it asks you to restart, just quit software update.  They&#8217;ll take effect whenever you next restart your mac (which can lead to some humorous confusion if, like me, you only restart once in a great while).</p>
<p>The larger problem here is that Apple has yet to open up software update to third party developers.  Most are using the sparkle framework these days (<a href="http://sparkle.andymatuschak.org/" rel="nofollow">http://sparkle.andymatuschak.org/</a>) but it works on a per-app basis. Couple this with Firefox and other mozilla apps (which uses their own updater and a separate updater for addons) and it&#8217;s really easy to end up in multiupdate hell: launching and relaunching apps and systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
