<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Observations about keyword rich anchor text and Google rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.purevisibility.com/2008/02/observations-about-keyword-rich-anchor-text-and-google-rankings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.purevisibility.com/2008/02/observations-about-keyword-rich-anchor-text-and-google-rankings/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 04:14:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: glenncz</title>
		<link>http://blog.purevisibility.com/2008/02/observations-about-keyword-rich-anchor-text-and-google-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-888</link>
		<dc:creator>glenncz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 02:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.purevisibility.com/2008/02/observations-about-keyword-rich-anchor-text-and-google-rankings/#comment-888</guid>
		<description>Stan, it all depends on what you are doing.  I&#039;m a Chiropractor and have treat &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.czchiro.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;back pain in Scranton&lt;/a&gt;, Pa. and am getting high google ranking because just because I have content on my pages.  I know that is key.  You can&#039;t link to just nothing, you have to have lots of those keywords on your webpage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stan, it all depends on what you are doing.  I&#8217;m a Chiropractor and have treat <a href="http://www.czchiro.com" rel="nofollow">back pain in Scranton</a>, Pa. and am getting high google ranking because just because I have content on my pages.  I know that is key.  You can&#8217;t link to just nothing, you have to have lots of those keywords on your webpage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Marketing Tools That Work &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Keywordluv Wordpress Plugin Looks Like A Great Way To Get Internet Marketers To Leave Blog Comments</title>
		<link>http://blog.purevisibility.com/2008/02/observations-about-keyword-rich-anchor-text-and-google-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-682</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Marketing Tools That Work &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Keywordluv Wordpress Plugin Looks Like A Great Way To Get Internet Marketers To Leave Blog Comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.purevisibility.com/2008/02/observations-about-keyword-rich-anchor-text-and-google-rankings/#comment-682</guid>
		<description>[...] come blogs get more comments. The problem is many people who leave a comment would rather leave keyword rich links instead of their name. But many believe that method looks spammy, which it very well does in many [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] come blogs get more comments. The problem is many people who leave a comment would rather leave keyword rich links instead of their name. But many believe that method looks spammy, which it very well does in many [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan Eakins</title>
		<link>http://blog.purevisibility.com/2008/02/observations-about-keyword-rich-anchor-text-and-google-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan Eakins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.purevisibility.com/2008/02/observations-about-keyword-rich-anchor-text-and-google-rankings/#comment-186</guid>
		<description>Question:    What are we talking about in cost to get a NEW website to the 1st page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question:    What are we talking about in cost to get a NEW website to the 1st page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Vielmetti</title>
		<link>http://blog.purevisibility.com/2008/02/observations-about-keyword-rich-anchor-text-and-google-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Vielmetti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 03:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.purevisibility.com/2008/02/observations-about-keyword-rich-anchor-text-and-google-rankings/#comment-92</guid>
		<description>Steve -

Having done a fair bit of blogging in my time, here&#039;s some observations from that part of the world.

If you are doing link-blogging with the help of a clipping service like delicious, the default behavior tends towards using the  tag as the link text.  By default, I mean lazy - there are lots of ways to bookmark a page that let you quickly stuff in a link.  That points to the need for link-friendly title tags.

The other path towards link-blogging is to totally rewrite the title copy - Jorn Barger&#039;s influential Robot Wisdom handles things that way.  In his case he has link-text of the site, not the title text, so that will tend to influence link weight of sites with good names.  see e.g.

http://robotwisdom2.blogspot.com/

Typically, if you are linking from a person&#039;s name, the kinds of blog-based comment tools will connect name + web site.  This is one way that bloggers end up with a lot of very natural links to their own name to their blog, via comments or inline references.

A well designed wiki like Wikipedia or Arborwiki will have a name space that is super easy to guess the right name in, and thus will be easy for someone generating a link on the fly to type in the correct URL without looking it up.  You can chalk up a lot of Wikipedia links to laziness, and a well-designed and comprehensive wiki architecture will bend over backwards to make it easy to link to (including fixing variant spellings with aliases).

Bloggers will also often link back to each other&#039;s postings with some kind of very simple shorthand text, in cases where they want to make a lot of links but don&#039;t want to have the page text be huge.  Look at the phrase &quot;More than 1000 of you got fired today.&quot; on

http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/2/charlie_o_donnell_to_fired_yahoos__come_work_here_

That&#039;s implemented as eight (8!) links in less than one line. That&#039;s extreme, but not too atypical when discussion is fast and furious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve -</p>
<p>Having done a fair bit of blogging in my time, here&#8217;s some observations from that part of the world.</p>
<p>If you are doing link-blogging with the help of a clipping service like delicious, the default behavior tends towards using the  tag as the link text.  By default, I mean lazy &#8211; there are lots of ways to bookmark a page that let you quickly stuff in a link.  That points to the need for link-friendly title tags.</p>
<p>The other path towards link-blogging is to totally rewrite the title copy &#8211; Jorn Barger&#8217;s influential Robot Wisdom handles things that way.  In his case he has link-text of the site, not the title text, so that will tend to influence link weight of sites with good names.  see e.g.</p>
<p><a href="http://robotwisdom2.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://robotwisdom2.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>Typically, if you are linking from a person&#8217;s name, the kinds of blog-based comment tools will connect name + web site.  This is one way that bloggers end up with a lot of very natural links to their own name to their blog, via comments or inline references.</p>
<p>A well designed wiki like Wikipedia or Arborwiki will have a name space that is super easy to guess the right name in, and thus will be easy for someone generating a link on the fly to type in the correct URL without looking it up.  You can chalk up a lot of Wikipedia links to laziness, and a well-designed and comprehensive wiki architecture will bend over backwards to make it easy to link to (including fixing variant spellings with aliases).</p>
<p>Bloggers will also often link back to each other&#8217;s postings with some kind of very simple shorthand text, in cases where they want to make a lot of links but don&#8217;t want to have the page text be huge.  Look at the phrase &#8220;More than 1000 of you got fired today.&#8221; on</p>
<p><a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/2/charlie_o_donnell_to_fired_yahoos__come_work_here_" rel="nofollow">http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/2/charlie_o_donnell_to_fired_yahoos__come_work_here_</a></p>
<p>That&#8217;s implemented as eight (8!) links in less than one line. That&#8217;s extreme, but not too atypical when discussion is fast and furious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DE</title>
		<link>http://blog.purevisibility.com/2008/02/observations-about-keyword-rich-anchor-text-and-google-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>DE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.purevisibility.com/2008/02/observations-about-keyword-rich-anchor-text-and-google-rankings/#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Great post lots of good information on traffic. Backlinks are great to use especially from google&#039;s view point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post lots of good information on traffic. Backlinks are great to use especially from google&#8217;s view point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
